Thank you to Earth’s Future Reviewers in 2018

Peer review is one of the most important professional activities for scientists, because it ensures the quality of science that is shared with colleagues and with the world. Reviewers generously donate their time and effort with the knowledge that are key to sustaining scientific rigor. Earth’s Future is fortunate to engage excellent reviewers that support the growth and reputation of our young journal as it receives and publishes highâ quality, highâ impact articles. We recognize the time, effort, and dedication that each review requires and extend a heartfelt thank you to all of our reviewers. Last year, Earth’s Future received 395 peer reviews from 297 individuals that are listed below; reviewers who contributed three or more reviews are recognized in italics. Our acceptance rate remains steady at ~40%, while the number of submissions continue to increase at a healthy pace (269 in 2018).Thank you all for your important and valued contributions to our science in 2018.Key PointsLast year, Earth’s Future received 395 peer reviews from 297 individualsThank you all for your important and valued contributions to our science in 2018Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150554/1/eft2549_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150554/2/eft2549.pd

The (In)Visible Health Risks of Climate Change

This paper scrutinizes the assertion that knowledge gaps concerning health risks from climate change are unjust, and must be addressed, because they hinder evidence-led interventions to protect vulnerable populations. First, we construct a taxonomy of six inter-related forms of invisibility (social marginalization, forced invisibility by migrants, spatial marginalization, neglected diseases, mental health, uneven climatic monitoring and forecasting) which underlie systematic biases in current understanding of these risks in Latin America, and advocate an approach to climate-health research that draws on intersectionality theory to address these inter-relations. We propose that these invisibilities should be understood as outcomes of structural imbalances in power and resources rather than as haphazard blindspots in scientific and state knowledge. Our thesis, drawing on theories of governmentality, is that context-dependent tensions condition whether or not benefits of making vulnerable populations legible to the state outweigh costs. To be seen is to be politically counted and eligible for rights, yet evidence demonstrates the perils of visibility to disempowered people. For example, flood-relief efforts in remote Amazonia expose marginalized urban river-dwellers to the traumatic prospect of forced relocation and social and economic upheaval. Finally, drawing on research on citizenship in post-colonial settings, we conceptualize climate change as an ‘open moment’ of political rupture, and propose strategies of social accountability, empowerment and trans-disciplinary research which encourage the marginalized to reach out for greater power. These achievements could reduce drawbacks of state legibility and facilitate socially-just governmental action on climate change adaptation that promotes health for all

Decoupling : natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth

The original publication is available from http://web.unep.org/publicationsBy 2050, humanity could devour an estimated 140 billion tons of minerals, ores, fossil fuels and biomass per year – three times its current appetite – unless the economic growth rate is “decoupled” from the rate of natural resource consumption. Developed countries citizens consume an average of 16 tons of those four key resources per capita (ranging up to 40 or more tons per person in some developed countries). By comparison, the average person in India today consumes four tons per year. With the growth of both population and prosperity, especially in developing countries, the prospect of much higher resource consumption levels is “far beyond what is likely sustainable” if realized at all given finite world resources, warns this report by UNEP’s International Resource Panel. Already the world is running out of cheap and high quality sources of some essential materials such as oil, copper and gold, the supplies of which, in turn, require ever-rising volumes of fossil fuels and freshwater to produce. Improving the rate of resource productivity (“doing more with less”) faster than the economic growth rate is the notion behind “decoupling,” the panel says. That goal, however, demands an urgent rethink of the links between resource use and economic prosperity, buttressed by a massive investment in technological, financial and social innovation, to at least freeze per capita consumption in wealthy countries and help developing nations follow a more sustainable path. - Source: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Publications/Decoupling/tabid/56048/Default.aspxPublishers' versio